Other documents, cannot satisfy the two-prong test set forth in Rogers v. ![]() Defendants argue that the Complaint, along with its exhibits and Plaintiffs sue Defendants because one of their recently released computer games has the name "In their Motion to Dismiss, Defendants seek dismissal on the grounds that the FirstĪmendment prohibits trademark claims for the use of a term in the title of an expressive work Ģ:12-cv-12805-VAR-MJH Doc # 17 Filed 05/09/13 Pg 1 of 10 Pg ID 8822 Then it is suggested that Gearbox Read this case and know that the precedent is set for Blizzard to have no basis to sue them for keeping Homeworld: Cataclysm named the same if (hopefully when) they remake it. Some guy from GBX said that Blizz bought Cataclysm trademark, and they (GBX) would rename it. ![]() Does Blizzard own Homeworld: Cataclysm trademark? No.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |